I Will Write In Palin If Rubio Is VP

I will not vote for Marco Rubio as Vice President if Mitt Romney selects him to run on his ticket.  He is NOT constitutionally eligible to be President or Vice President, and I would be a damn hypocrite in holding my ire and giving him my vote after working as hard as possible to educate people on Barack Obama’s ineligibility.

Call me a Birther, call me a Tea Party hick, call me an “extremist” or racist, I could give a flying forgery.  I just don’t care anymore.  I’m not going to be like one of those liberals who complain about the rich not paying more taxes and not voluntarily putting their money where their mouth is.  And conservatives have constantly compromised on principle to the point where most Americans don’t think there is much difference in the spending habits of either party. 

If you consider yourself a conservative – let me advise you that you can’t buy back your integrity when it’s convenient.  The video of the Middle School kids cursing the elderly lady on the bus in New York would never have happened if we, as a society, doled out a little more public shame and disgust rather than pretending we just “don’t judge.”  Conservatism is, and should be, demonstrating character, even when it’s not convenient just as the people who bought us liberty did with their blood.  You can’t change Hollywood or the media by yourself, but you damn sure can give an example to your kids, friends and cohorts.  You can finally quit pretending you believe in the Constitution and actually do it at the voting booth.

I’ve written extensively how Heritage Foundation, Free Congress Foundation and Moral Majority founder Paul Weyrich threatened to lead a revolt against the GOP in 2008 if McCain selected Mitt Romney as Vice President.  I’m certain Paul wasn’t just turning but on “puree” in his grave upon learning that Mitt Romney is now the GOP nominee.  Weyrich saw how unprincipled and deceptive Romney would be just to get power although I’m sure he’d buy the “worst of two evils” argument for November.  But I’m not going to be silent about stopping Rubio, Jindal (and possibly Santorum) from further desecrating our Constitution and rule of law.

The rule of law is being tortured and molested not only by this President, but by judges, policemen and policewomen, and the only party that has a chance keeps making excuses to go back on their promises.  (Remember Boehner and company’s 2010 Contract With America clone?)

The one time I have a chance to USE the authority George, Thomas, Samuel and others gave me to override the stupidity, blindness or subversion of others is on November 5th, 2012.  And although I can’t give any opportunity for the putative Pennsylvania Avenue pretender to remain in power any longer by withholding a Romney vote – I can at least uphold the constitution of the United States.  And I want you to do so too.

For the record I’ve generally liked Rubio but always felt his “conservatism,” while genuine, didn’t go to the bone.  Some were shocked that he endorsed Human Events 2006 Top 10 RINO over Gingrich or Santorum, but I wasn’t so shocked.  The mere fact he has NOT acknowledged that he is ineligible to be President or Vice President proves that he is not a Constitutionally correct conservative, much less worthy of our trust for carrying on the conservative mantle.

If you’re so convinced you need a Latino, then go with Susana Martinez or my Hispanic Hero - @SooperMexican.  But for God’s sake let’s don’t let the GOP tarnish constitutional lawfulness as they did fiscal conservatism.

The patriot hero Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch just argued this issue in Florida in the case of Obama’s eligibility.  Judicial Watch has taken on the FDA, DOJ, EPA, Big Pharma, White House (both Bush and Obama) and even the issue of domestic terrorist surveillance and is one of the longest patriotic conservative activists on our side.  This was the group that uncovered the leaking of classified documents to Hollywood filmmakers for the Obama Infomercial masquerading as a major film release to coincide with the 2012 election.  Named as one of the 10 most effective organizations by The Hill newspaper and the nations largest government watchdog group, Judicial Watch has filed 75 lawsuits and 850 FOIA requests against Obama administration alone.   What I’m trying to say here, is that no one on the right has ever confused Larry Klayman with Alex Jones.

For anyone who is willing to follow the facts (and the Constitution) – and not their own personal bias or agenda – the evidence concerning Natural Born Citizen is indisputable:

• John Jay’s letters to Washington explaining why the President needed to be a soil born US citizen to two US citizen parents;
• Jefferson, Adams, Monroe, Hamilton and many others all acknowledging Vatel’s Law of Nations as a chief guidebook for the writing of our Constitution that clearly defines Natural Born Citizen as I described.
• The Federalist papers (No. 68) written by Hamilton confirm the same exact definition.
• There are at least 3 Congressional acts that were passed after the Constitution was adopted that give us insight into what the Framers of the Constitution meant by “natural born Citizen.” The 1790 First Congress, which included twenty members who had been delegates to the Constitutional Convention eight of whom were members of the Committee of Eleven that drafted the “natural born Citizen” clause, passed the Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat.103,104) which provided that “And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens.”  George Washington would have vetoed this bill had he disagreed with it.  Or a similar one in the following Congress.
• The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the matter as to what is a “natural born Citizen” was in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875) (decided after the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted in 1868 and holding that "all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners").
• (A more scholarly overview of these and other facts on Mario Apuzzo’s site.)

The Left has tried exhaustively to confuse and denounce these conclusions.  They usually do it just like Obama’s lawyers tried to in the Judicial Watch Florida hearing where they simply leave out portions of a finding that are inconvenient.  You can watch that hearing here – it is thrilling to see Obama lawyers caught trying to deceive a judge:

Video streaming by Ustream

“So, PolitiJim why hasn’t any court already upheld this in all the cases brought against Obama’s eligibility so far?”

Good question.  Why did a judge find Aaron Walker guilty against harassing terrorist Brett Kimberlin just by reporting Kimberlin’s previous crimes and thus completely ignoring the First Amendment of our Constitution?  Because, not only are there terrible lawyers, there are idiot judges and corrupt judges.  We learned that the judge in Georgia was actually close friends of Obama’s attorney.  In San Diego, we saw a judge seemingly ready to find against Obama, but strangely changed his tune immediately following a visit from a paralegal from Obama’s law firm.  MOST of those eligibility cases were NOT brought on Article 2 (Natural Born Citizen) grounds, but on trying to introduced the forged birth certificate.  Not only did we have some really inept legal power, most courts claimed that the plaintiff did not have standing.  NONE actually argued the salient points of Article 2 or Minor v. Happersett precedent.  One tried to argue an Indiana state law (which has no parentage to explain of Federal law or the Constitution of the United States) and another tried to confuse “a US Citizen” with a “Natural Born Citizen” in the Wong Kim Ark case.

In fact, until Klayman came along, only the New Jersey court case with Mario Apuzzo was brought with some level of competence and without the hysterics and circus acts present in many others.  And Florida has the luxury of having a statute that allows ANY citizen to challenge the eligibility of any candidate on a Florida ballot.  But – if truth and the Constitution always won out in court – we wouldn’t have allowed 50 million babies to be killed since 1973.  That is more than the ENTIRE population of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Kansas and Kentucky combined.

You don’t like what the Framers did in disallowing great conservatives like Jindal and Rubio from having an opportunity to lead this nation?  Fine.  Then FOLLOW THE FRIGGIN’ LAW and CONSTITUTION and change it the way you are SUPPOSED to.  With an Amendment.

If you know this and still vote for him, you are no better than the common crook who shoplifts because he can just ignore the law “this time.”  Or the playa who doesn’t want the responsibility of a “baby daddy” and decides it’s cheaper to take his victim to the free clinic.

Just keepin’ it real, homey.

Freedom ain’t free and every decision you make to subvert the Constitution, makes it easier to do the next time when your conscience is weakened.

“PolitiJim!  What if we lose the election because of the Hispanic vote?!!”

What if Russia’s, Mexico’s or China’s Barack Obama 2 is raised as a REAL Manchurian candidate and is able to discipline themselves for the next two, three or four election cycles to look harmless, and does WORSE than what Obama has done?  It was OPENLY discussed in 1782 and was perpetrated on us since Bill Ayres was planning it 20 years ago.  It’s no longer hypothetical.  Did you really think it was possible for someone to get elected without ever showing their grade school, high school, college, grad school, state senate, social security and passport records?  We don’t even know who paid for this guys school tuition and he’s had $100 Million in donors that we can’t even track.

I suspect one of the reasons that so many of the founders reiterated that our form of Constitutional Republicanism would ONLY work with “moral” and “religious” people is because that they knew, people with no moral standard could take advantage of the freedoms and trusts in the system.  The rules for leaving your car unlocked are much different at church or a big city parking parking garage.  Cloward and Piven devoted their lives to seeking out these “weak points” and exploiting them to crash that very system.  Benjamin Franklin responded to someone asking him what kind of government the framers came up with for our new country.  Franklin famously responded:

A Republic.  If you can keep it.

As we know, most of society is more interested in Kim Kardashian’s latest tweet or boyfriend twit rather than volunteering to watch over the power they give their local school board or city council.  Civic duty now reflects of mostly corrupt relativists who see it for their own power or potential payday.  We’ve been come a culture of entertainment rather than effort, indulgence rather than integrity, and recreation rather than responsibility.

The Framers clearly knew that it would be difficult to stop the worst nature of men, and with admitted Divine help, attempted to design healthy conflicts so no person or group could have enough power to depart from the Constitutional Republican tenants and rights laid out in our very simple founding documents. However, as we’ve seen from Mr. Obama, someone who does not appreciate Judeo/Christian values or the individualistic freedoms of our heritage can not only wantonly ignore the law, but can INTENTIONALLY create crimes that can be covered up within his own sphere of the Executive Branch.  If Holder IS found in contempt by the House, it is Obama’s own donor flakey who gets the case deciding whether to prosecute him or not.

And don’t forget that at any time, Barack Obama can grant a pardon to ANYONE for ANY REASON without ANY repercussion.  Just like Mr. Holder arrange for terrorist and criminal donor pardons for Clinton.

Michelle Malkin is right that every GOP Senator that agreed to confirm Eric Holder despite his clear past crimes, bears some responsibility for every abuse of power perpetrated by Messrs Holder and Obama.  Even the Washington Post warned against Holder’s nomination and it was unheeded by Republicans who didn’t want to appear “racists” rather than merely being responsible with the power we loaned them.

And although many on the left want to redefine “Americanism” to be freedom without responsibility or welfare without obligation – the Framers knew that the Constitution itself prohibited such and thus focused on how to create a system of approvals that would survive momentary swings of popular opinion or mistakes.  The fact that ONLY the President and Vice President have these exceptions, underlies their concern of how quickly the position could become a tyrannical one.

And the most likely saboteur would not be someone who was raised to appreciate those American freedoms after living in tyranny – but someone who was intent to weaken them.  Someone who didn’t consider themselves or their families “American.”

I’ve already decided to sedate myself heavily with sangria and hold my nose in voting for the amoral Mitt just to stop more Obamanation.  But thank God the Founders intended a SEPERATE vote for the person who would step in to lead the country should the President be incapacitated or die. 

If Romney or the RINO establishment attempt to push a non-Natural Born Citizen, I’m writing in Sarah Palin.

And you know – even if he nominates a true Natural Born Citizen like Jeb Bush, it still might not be a bad idea for us not to automatically buy in to any RINO Romney wants to extend in power beyond his potential of eight years.

---

UPDATE: 6-24-2012

I’ve gotten some strange responses from this post, enforcing an anti-intellectual view of issues surrounding the “Natural Born Citizen” issue.  It saddens and pisses me off all at the same time.  Besides the comments below that make no sense (and show that there are conservatives who have no integrity) I have gotten private emails/direct tweets that are suggesting this issue has already been decided by the courts.  They are the Obama Administration's and the GOP Establishment’s Useful Idiots.  I address it here.

Read More

Where’s Aldo and Rick’s 7 Obama Similarities

 

There is no way that Rick Santorum wouldn’t be a better President than Barack Obama.  Of course, we could say the same thing about any one of the Santorum children.  It’s not a towering standard, you know.

There are huge contrasts between the former Senators.  Obama has rumors of a gay sex life while the rumor is that Santorum’s position on sex is to outlaw it.  You get the idea.

As PolitiJim readers know, as I’ve begun to vet the vested one, I was more than mildly amused by some strange similarities Rick has with the Kenyan formerly known as “Barry.”  Here are

In no particular order of importance:

 Eligibility Issues

Yes, Sheriff Joe Arapio’s Cold Case Posse affirmed what hundreds of graphic arts experts have known since the day after the White House posted the long firm birth certificate.  It’s not only a forged document, it’s a blatantly BAD forged birth certificate.  But in their obsessive fear of tarnishing their anti-tin foil hat reputations, conservative media have ignored the development of Larry Klayman’s Judicial Watch joining the increasing attack on Obama’s eligibility on an entirely different front.  That of Barack Obama’s own admission that his FATHER was not a US citizen, thus invalidating him from being a “natural born citizen.”

While PolitiJim was caught up in the obvious forgeries, we didn’t pay attention on NBC until the Justia.com scandal.  it came to light that the legal resource used by nearly every judge in the country (Justia.com) had removed references to an 1875 Supreme Court decision called “MINOR v HAPPERSETT”  BEFORE THE ELECTION OF 2008 as Obama’s eligibility issue was gaining steam.  It was already obvious to those of us paying attention to disappearing INS, passport, hospital records that some serious corruption was occurring.  But to tinker with a database removing evidence of ENTIRE SUPREME COURT decisions was startling. 

Why would they do this?  Because Minor v Happersett DEFINES by the Supreme Court what a “natural born citizen” is.  According to Article II of the Constitution, with the exception of those alive at the time of its signing, someone is a NBC only if BOTH parents were citizens at the time of their birth on US soil.  In Obama’s case it is unnecessary to address WHERE he is was born, since he admitted in both of his books that his father was a British citizen. Official immigration records confirm it.

It is undeniable that not only does this Supreme Court affirm that definition, the Constitution's Framers knew it acknowledging their own admissions of reliance on “natural law” and the Law of the Nations. And it is further underscored in the Naturalization Acts of 1790, 1795, 1802 all being passed DURING the founders early legislative activity.  The definitive scholarly article and source is from Mario Apuzo and his article, “Putative President Barack Obama’s Unconstitutional Amending of Article II’s “Natural Born Citizen” Clause.”

Rick Santorum’s Eligibility Issues

We clearly know that Rick Santorum was born in Virginia.  However, there seems to be no record of his father applying for, or receiving US citizenship.  Rick’s mother claims she has the documents.  Yet, after REPEATED requests by numerous organizations, he not only has not produced them, he continues to evade a fairly straight forward issue.  WHY have Gingrich, Paul and even Romney provided all documents necessary to prove they are NATURAL BORN CITIZENS but the “true,” “Constitutional” conservative has not?

We also now know that McCain, Jindahl, and Rubio are NOT “natural born citizens.”  (Talk about the demise of made in the USA, huh?)  As the Washington Times points out, the REAL scandal is at the feet of the Conservative Media (let alone the national media), who refuse to cover this.

Is Rick Santorum A Natural Born Citizen

Presidential Qualifications and Qualities

Yes, they are both young with school age families.  Yes, both are attorneys, began their congressional careers in the mid-90’s, and both served as legislators for 14 years.

Oddly both have had issues regarding their law licenses.  You may remember Bill Clinton’s license was suspended for five years following his perjury in the Monica Lewinsky case.   Like MOST politicians, he kept it active as President, just as Ron Paul continues to keep his medical license active.  Santorum’s problem is likely only the neglect to pay his annual $70 fee.  Barack and Michelle BOTH “voluntarily” inactive and/or retired for unknown reasons.

Neither one of them had managed a business, organization or have had any executive experience prior to running for President outside of small offices of their campaigns or congressional office.  Neither have a history of great legislative insight or accomplishment, nor are either prolific with the pen.

Both have flatly lied about previous political positions, and while some would argue that ALL politicians do this – Paul and Gingrich don’t deny things that are easily proven.   For instance, Obama claimed on the campaign trail in 2008 he had always been against the Iraq war.  A lie.  Santorum claimed he had never been for insurance mandates and had never been for bailouts. Lie. Lie.  Both Santorum and Sotero have a a laundry list of lies.

Barack Obama pretends to be an authentic “black” man in the cultural (not racial) sense of the word despite having grown up in private schools and supported by Bill Ayers parents and rich Saudi billionaires.  Rick Santorum claims to be an authentic “Tea Partier” despite a glaring invisibility (or even dismissal) and Pennsylvania Tea Partiers pointing out the hypocrisy.

Voter Fraud Issues

In our discussion of Barack Obama’s potential involvement in Hillary SuperDelegate deaths, we cover clearly documented voter fraud in his campaign.   It turns out Santorum has been up to dirty tricks as well.  Rick’s campaign tried to steal a caucus in Missouri ala Obama against Clinton, and disenfranchised GOP voters in Tennessee by strong-arming Gingrich delegates to switch AFTER they had been pledged per the popular vote.  It seems this also happened in Alabama, with Santorum coming out with unexplained statistical anomalies just like Obama did in the 2008 Texas primaries and caucuses.  These tactics were so well known in Pennsylvania that GOP insiders INTENTONALLY voted for Santorum’s Democrat opponent Bob Casey.

However Rick has succeeded in area even Barack Obama feared to tread.  Fixing the vote of EVANGELICALS and Christians to give him a false boost.  At least he is narrowing in on Obama in the “unscrupulousness” race.  Even the Christian Broadcasting Network admitted that it wasn’t the clean overwhelming endorsement the Santorum campaign made it out to be.

Lying about Lobbying

Obama made a big deal in 2008 claiming he hadn’t take a dime from lobbyists and they would be disallowed in his administration.  As we know, he got more money from Exxon than John McCain and even the USA Today rolled their journalistic eyes at audacity of hype.  At least 12 lobbyists have jobs in the White House.

Righteous Rick the self-proclaimed “Reformer” has been incessant in his claim that he is a Washington outsider.  Yeah, not so much.  In fact in this, he is even WORSE in his misleading than the man he wants to move out of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.  Convicted former lobbyist Jack Abramoff has been trying to rehabilitate his image after serving his jail sentence and strangely gave “non answers” about Santorum.  Now we know why.  He was busy getting Santorum to kill sweatshop bills in exchange for campaign cash  (Seriously, click the link to see the ACTUAL billing records from Abramoff).  Worse Santorum’s own peers in Congress called RICK himself “a high powered lobbyist,” which could explain why he’s won more states than obtained congressional endorsements.  Who wants to be caught with that guy, right?  And he outshines on Obama in the “Lobbying Lies and Hypocrisy” department by a long shot.  Not only has he outright lied, that he was part of the “K Street” project that played a role in Tom Delay’s conviction, he lies that it ever existed!  Santorum moved more of his Senate staff into lobbying than any other and even employs convicted lobbyist and former Abramoff prostituted procurer as his South Carolina campaign aide.  I’m shocked Santorum hasn’t spun this to claim he creates more jobs than Romney.  But then again, campaign is still young.

(PolitiJim note: As the aide claims to have accepted Jesus, I am not insinuating Hinri is not a “new creature in Christ.” We are only noting that attempts made by Santorum to cover up Hinri’s involvement instead of just embracing his new spiritual condition openly and unapologetically while employing the CONSUMATE “insider” Santorum claims to be so distant from.)

Nowhere is the audacity of lobbying tope, by Santorum, more evident than when he put lives at risk in legislation he authored.  Coined as the “Accuweather Protection Act of 2005,” he tried to strip the National Weather Service from providing storm warnings which (completely coincidentally of course) would help Rick’s Pennsylvania donor.  Not a single other conservative would support it.  You now may have a clue why conservative poster boy, Jim DeMint near endorsed Mitt Romney over the supposed “true” conservative in Santorum.  (Although DeMint could have gotten confused since Rick called Mitt a “true conservative of conviction who portrays our values” when he endorsed him in 2008.)

Maybe Rick’s reasons for supporting the Bridge to Nowhere and trying to scuttle Jim DeMint’s battle against earmarks (2 weeks before DeMint’s re-election by the way), was cutting into the Santorum college fund spigot.  A dad of seven has got to dad what a dad’s got to do.

Financial Impropriety

This is a truly unfair comparison to Rick Santorum since Obama had the advantage of living in the Chicago corruption incubator.  It will be curious to see if the mainstream media looks at the art of cash corruption by Obama’s Tony Rezko ties and the kick backs he got while a congressman in Illinois.  (PolitiJim wonders if Hillary Clinton saw the breadth and extravagance of Obama’s corruption compared to her piddly cattle futures and just gave up the Presidential battle over the sheer wonder of it.)

But where Obama has his land strip scandal that gave him a side lot to his house without paying for it, Santorum has an even worse situation on his Pennsylvania and Virginia homes including whether he or a GOP contributor paid for it.  Santorum refuses to answer questions about how he got a “preferred mortgage loan” from fledging private bank when his own disclosure statements show he didn’t qualify for it.

Rick broke state law (and lied while doing it) in getting Pennsylvanians to pay $100,000 for homeschooling for his children.  All of this while the school district was struggling financially.  And while the Santorum children lived in Virginia, not Pennsylvania.  Santorum was asked to give the money back…and refused.  Rick’s response?  He pays taxes in Pennsylvania, that covered the cost of what they took.  So it’s ok to break the law because you determined you are OWED it?  And the OTHER state and local services your house enjoyed DIDN’T ALSO cost money?  (I’m sorry Rick, the line for Occupy Wall Street entitlement movement is in the Democratic primary.)

Rick Santorum still has some ‘splaining’ to do on his charity set up for the poor.  Not his measly 1.8% giving from his new found lobbying wealth post-Pennsylvania politics, but an actual nonprofit he set up for the poor.  Funny how the money collected never really made it to the “poor,” unless you define “poor” as the managers and vendors needed to run it on 89% of the collections.  Similarly his “Leadership PAC” collected cash Rick said would, “reinforce our conservative allies,” but only gave away about 18%.  The rest was used to set up a lot of work (shocker) in the first two states in which he would compete.

Less damaging but fitting the “financial Pharisee” mold is when Santorum’s wife sued her doctor for $500,000 at the same time Rick authored a bill to cap medical malpractice at $250,000.  Of course, afterward Rick said that the $250K cap wasn’t set in concrete.  Much like his moving standard for principles measured against his actions.

Note to conservative Christians who keep covering for the Catholic Crusader of Conscience:

• Why did he give more away to politicians than the poor as a percentage?
  
• What REAL evidence is there that he can manage ANY organization much less the most powerful government on the planet when he can’t keep a CHARITY from excessive spending that keeps money from the poor?
  
• Since Jesus said “where your heart is there your money is also,” why do you continue to believe he is a “committed Christian” when he doesn’t tithe and gives so little his church and other charity?
  
• Why would he refuse to pay back money CLEARLY the law did not entitle him to and he had to lie to receive?

GOVERNMENT CONTROL

Clearly Obama wants to regulate your health care, your schooling, your product consumption and your sun tanning.  (Just ask Snooki.)  Government knows best.

Rick’s raucous riff’s (or egregious gaffes – you choose), range from accusing Trojans of being a temptation leading to adultery to promoting Protestants as poorly pious or worse.  None are more damaging, in PolitiJim’s opinion, than those in the video below.  those where he claims:

They have this idea that people should be left alone, be able to do whatever they want to do, government should keep our taxes down and keep our regulations low, thatwe shouldn't get involved in the bedroom, we shouldn't get involved in cultural issues. That is not how traditional conservatives view the world.

As I demonstrated in FOUR VIDEOS this week on PolitiJim, this is not an aberration.  This is WHO Rick Santorum is.  And he wants to make the case that government shouldn’t control your lives.  He wants to mandate ultrasounds but not prenatal screening.  Both provide information to the mother to make informed choices.  Both use tax payer money to administrate it.  And we want to trust THIS GUY to make the conservative case to the American people of why Obama’s control isn’t good but his is?  Really?

MEDIA COVER-UP

Old news alert: The media repeats every lie that Obama tells and continues to hide evidence that he is corrupt and ineligible.  The aforementioned Washington Times article says it all.  But the most disgusting thing to me about this campaign cycle has been the complicity of so called conservatives to do EXACTLY the same thing they complained about the media doing with Barack.

With JUST the information in THIS POST, all of us would expect Rush Limbaugh, Mark “Liberty” Levin, Laura Ingraham and Michelle Malkin to disdain this guy right?  Nope?  In order they say Rick is “the only conservative left in the race,” a true conservative, a true conservative, and “I hate Gingrich to much to look at the truth.”  (The last one is Politijim’s interpretation not an actual quote.)

Clearly, if a tiny bit of this was even DISCUSSED by conservative media, Rick’s poll numbers would drop faster than the pants on Pee Wee Herman in a New York porn theater.

And in looking likely to be President in 2013, we have the final inexplicable parallel to Barack Hussein Obama.  Amazement at their support in spite of such obvious disqualifications.

Read More