Did Ted Cruz Really Win Every County in Maine?

The Boston Globe and 2 local papers didn't give him a chance. He didn't win a single county in Massachussetts 4 days earlier. Did Cruz really win EVERY county in Maine?

By Cruz Camp's Own Admission, Heidi Should Be Thoroughly Vetted

The head of the Ted Cruz campaign has said Heidi is Ted's closest adviser. The FEC violations involve her current employer. No personal attacks, just a necessary professional evaluation of Heidi Cruz's role in the Cruz Crew.

How Ted Cruz Can Stop Immigration Abuse NOW!

As a self-described "constitutional expert" Canadian born Cruz could do us all a great service to stop illegal immigration by simply answer 4 teeny weeny questions...

The Complete Concordance of Cruz Corruption, Deceptions and Lies

Reagan was attacked by the Establishment, but people LIKED him. Cruz on the other hand is despised by mild mannered Huckabee and "sealed lips" George W. There is a reason. Here is an (almost) complete compendium of Cruz lies.

Why Isn't Anyone Discussing the SCOTUS Ruling on Natural Born Citizen?

There is a lie being told that "Natural Born Citizen" is not defined anywhere in the Constitution. That's True. What's Not True is that it is NOT settled by the Supreme Court. (It has)

Why I'm Happy To (Now) Be A Texan

In honor of @pmbasse, a descendant of one of the original 300 Texas settlers, I want to tell you WHY I LOVE TEXAS. As they say, I wasn't born here but I got here as soon as I could. And for me that was 3 times.

Ted Cruz Takes More Wall Street Money than Hillary Clinton

When you see who REALLY is running Ted's campaign, you realize how "inside" this pretend outsider is. The top CIA, Goldman Sachs executives are LITERALLY running his campaign.

The PolitiJim Twitter FF List

The most rewarding and frustrating experience on Twitter has to be the concept of Follow Friday. I have a solution. See where PolitiJim gets his news, and twinteraction from.

Showing posts with label media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media. Show all posts

Sunday, September 14, 2014

Why My Parents Should Have Abused Me

ParentsBeat

Adrian Peterson was arrested, suspended by the Minnesota Vikings, and convicted of child abuse in the court of public opinion.  I wish he had been my dad.


UPDATE: BREAKING SPORTS ALERT - September 15, 2014

Vikings' Adrian Peterson reinstated, will play Sunday

Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson, who was indicted on charges of reckless or negligent injury to a child, is being reinstated and is expected to play this Sunday against the New Orleans Saints, the team said Monday.


In a week where even the uber-liberal Daily Kos called the controversy surrounding Ray and Janay Rice was a public “lynching,”  ESPN and main stream media quickly found a new victim to completely discard any presumption of innocence before we had even a single detail.  Like Rice, Petersen has no history of the crime for which he is accused.  In the Rice incident, after 3 weeks there are cracks in the Iron Wall of Knee Jerk Liberalism as more learn that Janay admitted to the Ravens and Commissioner Goodell that not only did she instigate, slap and spit on Ray, but that over 40% of all domestic abuse victims are men.  Hmmm, well maybe a “lifetime ban” isn’t quite so righteous as the Witches Caucus of the Senate demands as a sacrifice.  (Just imagine how little truth would be known if the woman instigator WASN’T truthful and lied about what happened behind closed doors.  But ESPN wouldn’t let commentator Stephen A. Smith intelligently bring up the discussion without threats of losing his job and (worse) being stuck hosting a show with Keith Olbermann until he died.)  Yet I digress.

Petersen was recently a victim of true child abuse to 2 year old son by the mother’s boyfriend who murdered him just last year.  But by all means, let’s jump to conclusion that he immediately inflicted harm on one of his other children with a switch (nothing more than a tree twig) that is common (and lawful) in many places in the rest of the world.  Thank God he didn’t name his son “Redskin” or Eric Holder would already have him in Guantanamo.  How did simply doing something our parents and grandparents did become “child abuse?”

My parents suddenly quit spanking me when I was about 5.  My mother fell under the spell of one Dr. Benjamin Spock who took to every morning TV show and news program to explain that the greatest generation of the greatest country which had achieved the greatest moral and prosperity freedoms in history had it all wrong. 

My mom bought Benjamin’s BS instead of using the one in sociology she achieved at college and removed her 18” Phi Mu sorority paddle from display.  So when little PolitiJimmy decided to see if it might be more environmentally advantageous to burn a fire in the oven, she explained to me how wrong it was, how creative I was and assumed I could understand all this like a mature 30 year old.  She decided that there would be no more pain associated with anything I ever did wrong.  Well, at least until I started stealing cars and throwing plates at them when I was 16.  I can’t imagine what the policeman (whom I would come to know quite well) thought when I explained to him it hurt my feelings that I actually had to obey my parents over taking the car to my first kegger.

Granted, I had the highest esteem and confidence of any child in Chicago but also tested in the 5% percentile in self discipline, reason, moral judgment and respect for (any) authority. 

It took about 3 years of continued financial and legal destruction before I finally got the hint:  “There ARE rules and they do have consequences no matter how they make you FEEL.” 

It took another 2 decades, 2 marriages, 2 emotionally wounded children and even more financial devastation to start rewiring my brain, instinct and association to “get” how life worked and how valuable core character qualities like complete honesty, self-restraint and concern for others not only was beneficial to my life, but necessary to the pursuit of happiness.

I did somewhat better with my 2 children when they were young.  However, I learned that not all punishment was equal.  My daughter popped into this world with all the happiness, energy and vitality of her father.  She also had most of his reinforced iron will and obstinence.  And while I ALWAYS would paddle her out of love and not anger – even intentionally waiting an hour until I calmed down after she lied about drawing the likeness of the neighbor’s cat on the living room wall in purple.  (Seriously, it didn’t look like the cat at all.)

I never really tested the limits of how hard I could spank her, but I did increase the pressure – or duration - as she kept laughing through the entire thing thinking it was a game.  Even the few times a few tears were dropped, she’d be asking me for a cookie or to play only seconds afterward.    Needless to say, the paddle would break long before her determination would.

My son was completely different.  A stern look of disapproval would send him bawling and even putting my hand on the paddle would send him into convulsions.  He was so sensitive by nature he never really needed ANY physical punishment.  And both (thank God) have been far more successful in so many more “life” areas than I ever was, although I can’t take credit for either.

Yes, there are parents that have their own self-discipline, anger and emotional issues who, out of fear or ignorance, physically and emotionally harm their children.  They should be prosecuted immediately and fully so that THEY can learn boundaries that clearly aren’t being grasped any other way.

WND ran an article eloquently describing why it is that violent crime has tripled since the “Dr. Spock” era began.

The sexual revolution that started in the ’60s continues with many casualties. Promiscuity has become so rampant that 1 of every 4 teenage girls now has a sexually transmitted infection. In the last five decades, practices have become so deviant that the number of distinct STDs had risen from five to more than 50 – a sudden increase of a thousand percent. Obsession with sexual violence has brought a 318 percent increase in sexual assault.

 

There are many parenting styles.  And many studies of how effective (or ineffective) many are.  From the Ruben Hill study, I realized that my parents weren’t the worst parents – NEGLECTFUL.  They simply let their fear of peer judgment, or fear of their own ability to restrain themselves from inflicting TRUE harm upon me override what was best for me.  It is quite possible that the cruelty of my grandfather toward my father growing up played a role in over-compensating.  My mother however was spoiled rotten by her parents but likely also had issues in that they weren’t around all that much in her later years.  So, I don’t want to seem ungrateful for what they DID do for me. 

There are research studies that support that corporal punishment is beneficial.  From the UK Daily Mail:

Young children who are smacked by their parents grow up to be happier and more successful than those who have never been hit, research claims.

It found that children who are smacked before the age of six perform better at school when they are teenagers.

They are also more likely to do voluntary work and to want to go to university than those who have never been physically disciplined.

I was shocked to learn just how polarized academia was in research for this column.  As many studies have been published showing the benefits of corporal punishment I saw a pattern that the study authors are attacked – Alinsky style.  The Daily Kos (same one that thought maybe we were lynching Ray Rice by media excess) decided their best comeback against a Professor who found that even young children are better off for physical discipline was to stain her by saying, “Surprise! She’s a Christian.”  Perhaps they are unaware of how Christianity alone took a barbarian world into peace, freedom and prosperity exceeding every other “philosophy” in the history of the world.  Or perhaps they were just early Common Core graduates.

But the author (and subject of attack), Marjorie Gunnoe, professor of Psychology at Calvin College in the Michigan, found there was not enough evidence to prove that physical punishment harmed most children with the exception of a segment over the age of 6 who were STILL much more academically successful than their coddled contemporaries.  I seriously wonder if disconnect is where the parent is oblivious to the sensitivity of their own child or the MANNER in which they inflict it.  I probably would feel differently about my parents slapping my hand for attempting to touch the stove than if they dried to cut it off altogether.  And I really don’t’ see any studies that study the parents motivation of worldview guidelines – or how they would, since every parent thinks they are probably a great parent.

Of course at the end of the day you have to get into the detail of the study yourself to determine the true balance of the “he said, she said” battle of the PR corporal punishment battle.  As a layman, it seemed to me that the research of the “pro-punishment” group doesn’t have a lot of substantial empirical challenges, but I’m no researcher.  (Just ask my former professors.)  However, two facts stand out to me.  First, the central argument against punishment by it’s detractors is almost solely based in attacking the researcher and “method” rather than showing substantial data themselves.  Secondly is REAL WORLD experience.  You KNOW friends, family or neighbors that don’t spank their kids and have seen how those kids turn out.  You KNOW the character of your children.  And yourself.

And all of us know that PAIN is a great teacher.  Emotional pain in avoiding the wrong person to date makes a wiser in choosing the right one.  Physical pain of not eating motivates one to work.  The segment of children (like me) who are born with a bit stronger self-will than others ESPECIALY know this because we test the boundaries more than our peers and always seemed to have suffered for it.  It shouldn’t be especially surprising to know that the Dr. Spock’s of the world have created a departure of what has been known for over 3000 years:

He who spares his rod [of discipline] hates his son, but he who loves him disciplines diligently and punishes him early. (Proverbs 13:24 Amplified)

It seems obvious to me that the parent who does NOT inflict some form of appropriately measured discipline is another form of an abuser.

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Are YOUR Tweets or Posts maliciously harmful to individuals in the government?

Free-Speech

Douglas Hagmann, CEO of Hagmann Investigative Services, Inc., runs a private investigative agency serving a roster of Fortune 500 clients.  THIS IS NOT A WEIRD GUY IN HIS BASEMENT.  He also has been running explosive reports about the Obama administration from within the Department of Homeland Security. 

A group affiliated with the Obama Campaign, forced his service provider (GoDaddy) to delete it.  JUST TO MAKE SURE YOU GOT THAT: An Obama campaign group intentionally squelched free speech and got damning information about Obama’s plans deleted from GoDaddy.  With the help of Canada Free Press, he was able to move it just prior to the deletion.

This is far worse than a deranged liberal using the courts against a conservative blogger.  This is the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES INTENTIONALLY ATTEMPTING TO STOP FREE SPEECH.

The DHS Insider posts from Douglas Hagmann have been carried also on Canada Free Press and have alluded to a number of stunning revelations going on at DHS including:

  • The DHS is preparing for MASSIVE CIVIL UNREST (remember Soros said the same thing months ago, and MSM published reports show that DHS recently purchased 400 million rounds of ammo).
  • Not only is the Obama Administration predicting it, they are FACILITATING it.  (NDAA, and other Executive Orders circumstantially fit this narrative as does the expansion of TSA to middle America and the broad DHS directive on those that believe the Bible, the 2nd Amendment and speak out against the government.)
  • There is discussion of “delaying” the elections – perhaps indefinitely – due to civil violence.  (Remember the Obama Administration flakey who wrote an op-ed to this effect last year followed by NC Governor Purdue’s suggestion of the same?)
  • The Obama team is planning a carefully orchestrated a “false flag” attempt against Obama or his family - not to actually put him at harm - but to play into the chaos and help inflame race riots. (The Ulsterman Report’s Washington Insider has been disclosing this for OVER a year.)

Why is this so hard to fathom when not only was Obama himself a member of the radical, communist revolutionary New Party, but almost EVERY Obama advisor from Jarrett to SEIU and ACORN leaders all are all affiliated with those who haven’t stopped talking about a “people’s revolution?”  When the Department of Homeland Security removes ALL REFERENCES to Islamic Jihad terrorists and downplays Fort Hood, Times Square attacks as “isolated incidents” but declares conservative, gun owning, Christians and even Global Warming are the real terror threats – WHY is this notion so fantastic?

And why are so many conservatives still living in this fantasy world that EVERY Obama “conspiracy” story doesn’t deserve serious investigation?  Even when you have sworn testimony of Larry Sinclair who was threatened by disclosing Obama’s gay playmates first contacted him and then were killed?

Certainly Breitbart, HotAir, FOXNews and every MSCM - “Mainstream Conservative Media” - that (rightfully) rallies all around Aaron Walker from the Brent Kimberlin attacks, would be TRUMPTING this warning right?  Nope.  Not even a “chirp” regarding activities directly attributable to President Obama or his campaign that are clear totalitarian or fascist suppression of free speech.

GoDaddy Shuts Down Conservative News Site

And who has the story?  Tinfoil hat wearing Alex Jones of Infowars.com.  The mainstream media laughed when the DrudgeReport broke the Monica Lewinsky story.  The DrudgeReport laughed with the National Enquirer got John Edwards love child and Rush Limbaugh’s addiction.  And 'Putin and Mikhail Gorbachev are laughing that butts off that only THEY (and to a very limited extent the Washington Times) have covered Obama’s fraudulent past from birth certificates and social security numbers to Chicago kickbacks and strange assassinations. 

Breitbart Editor Claims Birth Certificate is Real

Sean Hannity has often said that journalism has died, but it seems that even CONSERVATIVE media won’t get their head out of their ink blotters to realize that we aren’t in Kansas anymore, Toto!  I’ve covered how Breitbart editor Ben Shapiro decided that ‘it’s just too preposterous to think of the people that would have to be involved for the birth certificate to have been forged.’  (He also told us that Breitbart staff told him there was “nothing there” despite numerous copies of Photoshop in their offices that could have verified this about 5 minutes.)

Andrew Coroner Breitbart Search Can anyone tell me how yesterday, Breitbart broke the story about a New York Times reporter who told his wife the night before his dead, “If I die on this trip, the New York Times did it,” but couldn’t be bothered to report the likely poisoning of a LA Coroner who might have performed the autoposy on Andrew Breitbart?  A search of “Andrew” and “Coroner” revels 4 hits – none of them are this story.

So surely the parent site to that watch dog of journalism - “Big Journalism” – would think an Obama campaign group that is shutting down free speech worthy of at least a blurb, right?   Breitbart.com, Michelle Malkin, NONE of the major voices of the battle against Obama have even a peep about this latest bombshell as of this posting (6/27/12 – 8:39 am CT). Breitbart Headlines 6-26-12 It seems Glenn Beck and acolytes can’t admit he has huge blind spots from truth when threatening the Tea Party with racism charges or declaring Gingrich a “progressive” because he acknowledges admiration for Ronald Reagan’s favorite President.  Everyone jumped on Ann Coulter, when she began to defend Romney, but now some of those same organizations refuse to cover the enormous evidence of vote fraud by the Romney campaign.  Drudge has been proven a partisan shill and even Rush Limbaugh is becoming a laughing stock of his former self misrepresenting facts and going forward with claims that make him look like the lying tool of the GOP the left always accuses him of being.  (His most recent is a claim from AFP or AEI that 87% of all government back solar loans fail.  They don’t – it’s 17%.  You don’t need to LIE about FACTS to make your point that the government should be out of the business of loan guarantees and, in fact, hurts your cause because you are caught distorting the truth.  It’s even worse that NONE of these people retract their errors.) 

You want to know why the liberals are getting away with so much?  It’s because OUR side plays just as much  - albeit a different form – of politics with the truth.

They deeps speak the words of liberals like: “As long as it helps MY VIEW of an issue, or a conservative pop star (like Rubio) I’ll either NOT COVER or spin the information to help.”

It’s so frustrating.  It’s like our own fellow troops not only don’t protect our rear flank, they often open fire on us while we are fighting the REAL enemy.

If conservatives don’t claim the “truth” as their guiding principle, how the hell can we separate ourselves from the mainstream liberal media in the eyes of middle America that NEEDS to know they can trust us?

It’s the same reason why we got stuck with Mitt Romney (pending a miracle by the Lawyers for Ron Paul before the GOP convention).  So many people were sharing unvetted versions of the “truth” in minutes of hearing it from someone else without doing their OWN homework.  There were some very good conservative bloggers, and even talk show radio hosts, regurgitating the lies of Romney shill (Elliot Abrams) that Newt Gingrich actually HURT Reagan against conservatives.  Eventually, people saw the truth, but not before a man (whom we owe a great deal of the success of the Reagan and conservative movement years to), was wrongly libeled and slandered.  It was an Alinsky tactic and most, to this day, have still not apologized or retracted.  Are these the “conservatives” we want to be our most vocal media representatives?

Most of these EXACT SAME PEOPLE DID NOTHING to document the clear efforts where Santorum actually DID hurt the conservative movement from Sotomayor (twice) to ProLife movement (seven times) or trying to sabotaging the campaign of Jim DeMint who was trying to STOP earmarks.  Let me be clear: There is no character or virtue if you are a conservative media news, blogger, tweeter or Facebook poster in shading the truth to your advantage.   And you have no integrity if you ONLY print that which fits with your own viewpoint, rather than facts.

It’s the same game played by Hollywood every weekend.  BE THE FIRST TO PUSH YOUR SPIN OF THE NEWS because that is what people will remember whether it was the truth or not.  A studio will often pad their box office results to be able to declare the #1 Movie of the weekend.  When it is found a day or two later that it was #2, it was after a million other media outlets already gave them free publicity that this was the “top” movie.  It’s dishonest (and lacks integrity) but they know you can’t put but a little of the toothpaste back in the tube and it works to their advantage – at least in the short run.

It’s why Obama keeps publishing false unemployment and economic data EVERY month.  People never hear about the revisions, but the emotion of the first (false) news still gives them goodwill.  Remember Romney saying that Gingrich didn’t do much of anything to help Ronald Reagan – something that now is embarrassingly false?  Remember when Mitt declared he was winner of Iowa?  The air goes out of the room and great attention is always paid to the FIRST news, but the REAL facts that may controvert it are almost always greeted with a “ho hum” and never have the same impact.  Obama uses it EVERY WEEK to keep his real shenanigans out of the news.

Sorry, conservatives and conservative media – truth counts.  If we play THEIR game and don’t abide by a form of moral code, we will end up having the SAME credibility (and problems) that they do.

People are chastising me for declaring I will not vote for Rubio if he is nominated Vice President because he (and Jindal) are NOT Constitutional eligible.  Byron York (whom I have genuine affection and subscribe to by RSS feed) wrote a column claiming that a US law had the right to define what the Constitution meant by “natural born citizen.”  He obviously got NO authoritative counterpoint source for his article but took the word of one professor who somehow thinks that the US Constitution was subjugated to definitions of laws passed by Congress, rather than the other way around.  (We just saw Scalia argue against the same insanity on the Arizona SCOTUS ruling.)  Byron York never addresses the more compelling counter arguments.  In fact the ONLY definitions for Constitutional interpretation are from a) historical evidence showing Founder’s intent (ie. Federalist papers), b) Federal court rulings and c) Supreme Court rulings.  And even THOSE aren’t always correct as Dredd Scott showed.  (And hopefully some day Roe vs Wade and the Eminent Domain ruling.)  The fact is that natural born citizen was defined in correspondence between Monroe and Washington, in Vattel’s Law of the Nations (which the Founders claimed foundational to their work), in first 3 immigration laws (acts) passed by MANY OF THOSE THAT HELPED WRITE THE CONSTITUTION, and was upheld in Minor v. Happerset in 1875.  Otherwise, it would be possible for an anchor baby to be born in the United States – be completely raised under an anti-American regime in Iran or Venezula, and then return when he was 35 to run for President.  Byron even notes that the law he cites doesn’t even USE the word “natural,” astoundingly ignorant that the very fact the Founders wrangled over Article II and used only “citizen” in other places meant that it had a DIFFERENT and specific meaning.  The worst part about York’s piece is that he uncharacteristically uses a tone of condescension in both his title and throughout his article.

But it proves that even GREAT writers (of which I count Byron York one) can be either lazy or biased in their own efforts.  I don’t think George Will is a Marxist despite his insane declaration that the architect of the conservative moment achievements of GOP control of Congress, Welfare Reform and 4 consecutive balanced budgets one.

But let’s face it.  We were not unified due to a lack of political and journalistic integrity on the part of our own.  And these false ideas were allowed to take root because MOST of us didn’t do our homework and just want to “go with” whatever our favorite columnist thinks.  When you make a judgment and embrace a cause you haven’t fully vetted - (not only are you an idiot but) you play directly into the game that Liberals and Mitt Romney have mastered. 

The mainstream media, moreover the Obama administration and it’s minions, KNOW how to manipulate popular opinion with emotion and timing.  IT CAN BE COMBATTED WITH UNIFICATION AROUND TRUTH and they can be shamed, but not without those on our side strongly counterbalancing their arguments at the beginning to keep a sizeable number of the audience from drawing any final conclusions.  For instance, had Rush, Levin, Malkin and Ingraham STRONGLY come out with evidence that Obama’s new long form birth certificate was an obvious forgery proven by numerous ex-FBI and ex-CIA agents within 24 hours of it’s release, we likely had invigorated a much stronger conservative in the GOP primary and kept Congress from passing NDAA and other tragic pieces of legislation.

But everyone just shut up, afraid to say anything and attract the mainstream media’s wrath.  Wow.  Talent on loan from Barney Fife right there.

My Point Is

My point is that this attack to shut down sites exposing Obama’s internal plans is only a “tip” of the iceberg.  If Ben Shapiro is unwilling to let facts change his views that it is inconceivable to imagine a sitting President forging a birth certificate despite a six month law enforcement investigation concluding otherwise – Breitbart is no longer anything more than a faded tombstone to a once great patriotic journalist.  And, frankly, not only will Obama continue to succeed in crimes against our constitution, we will never get the ear of the American people to explain the REAL issues that will turn this country around.

Our guys (both conservative politicians and media) are playing Nerf darts while our liberal opponents are using advanced biological tipped nuclear warheads by playing on our “civility” and “balance.” 

What happened to Mr. Hagmann is only a tiny piece of what is happening and being planned.  Yes, cover SWATing all you want.  It’s important.  But just as most of conservatives would think it impossible for Hillary, Barack, Eric and Janet to “plan” the deaths of hundreds of innocent people to have a political weapon to implement gun control – you are blind if you can’t already see that these people will stop at NOTHING to gain, stay in power and implement a socialistic tyranny.

And your complicit silence only emboldens them, and makes it harder to counter in the future.

Or did you forget that in 2008 these SAME FORCES began to use Law Enforcement to suppress free speech, even BEFORE Obama had power?

We speculated on “the Obama crime plan” last fall, and documented only a little of the insane corruption and crime Obama used to get INTO office.  The Hagmann and Ulsterman Insiders have only continued to predict with stunning accuracy – things thought impossible even by open minded conservatives just months ago.

When Obama has the ability to pardon anyone – including the CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT official of the United States, and that Chief has committed numerous crimes himself including manipulating the process to get FALN terrorists pardoned by Bill Clinton – what is the MSCM waiting for in connecting the dots?  You’re afraid you won’t be thought of as “intellectual” or worse, be derided by Alex Jones?

And when the National Enquirer, Pravda and many foreign papers like the Globe are consistently more accurate than Breitbart, Rush Limbaugh and most of the MSCM, something is seriously wrong with our “movement” with relativistic morals only printing what keeps them safe.

I’m certain there are some 1930’s German media that found “safe” still wouldn’t protect them from a political leader intent on fascist tyranny.

As for me – I will not be silent.  I AM Breitbart even if their namesake no longer is.  You be one too, will you?

Monday, April 23, 2012

FOX News: Fraud and Unbalanced on Voting

 FOX-special-on-vote

Fox had a TV special today on Voter Fraud. In fact, it’s still going on for another 1/2 hour but I’m so damn angry I’m not going to finish watching in order to rant.

Fox News is dead as an honest conservative voice.

I know, I know.  “Water is wet”  and “ “Clay Aiken is gay.”  But I watched three overt misrepresentations in the first 1/2 hour that continues to equivocate and dilute the REAL story.  Remember, FOX still hasn’t reported on Sheriff Joe’s investigation and intentionally shielded Romney numerous times in this primary already.  So much fair and balanced.

The show started out quite well showing numerous incidents where absentee ballots had been cast in elections without the knowledge of the person with that identity.  It also covered the former Alabama Democrat Rep. Artur Davis who shockingly admitted that voter fraud was a way of life for the Democratic party.  This was the guy who seconded Obama’s nomination for President and the only Congressional Black Caucus member who voted against ObamaCare.

However in three of the main segments in the first half hour, FOX News lied,omitted and manipulated facts to blur the real culpability of the Democrats in this cowardly practice.

The first was discussing the Scott Walker recall at length.  FOX did cite the guy who signed the recall petition 80 times and noted that the Wisconsin officials said they would not remove duplicates or obvious signatures like Mickey Mouse or Adolph Hitler.  But in actually discussing the facts of what happened they stopped at reporting only that the Wisconsin Republican Party began to manually check duplicates where they had 30 days to file objections and could not finish in time to log an objection.  They completely ignored the effort by True The Vote’s “Verify the Recall”  that mobilized over 13,000 volunteers in 49 states to identify over 400,000 fraudulent signatures including that of Donald Duck.  FOX left it sounding like “no one really knows if there was fraud or not.”

The second item was a discussion of the 2000 Florida Presidential count for Bush versus Gore.  I didn’t expect them to reveal the whole truth behind how Gore and the Democrats had systematically attempted to subvert our 200 year voting traditions and laws but was dumbfounded by their spin suggesting that it is possible Bush stole the election.  No mention that the USA Today, Miami Herald and the Washington Post showed Bush’s margin would have nearly TRIPLED.  This doesn’t even account for all the other slimy Democrat tactics like trying to smear Katherine Harris, or trying to steal the recount.  (Don’t forget, Gore illogically received three times as many “recount” improvements as Bush did – a statistical improbability.  But FOX made it sound like it is still “up in the air,” when facts are conclusive to independent observers.

The last issue was what set me off to ignore my Sunday Cubs game to get this done.  FOX besmirched the integrity of the Father of our country to make it sound like the man who “couldn’t tell a lie” was just an an average politician. 

Fox’s fake George Washington take: George Washington bought votes to buy his election!

Maybe the truth doesn’t make for quite such a good “voter fraud special.”  I mean, who cares if you besmirch the reputation of perhaps the most important founder of our country if it will help your TV show, right?

In fact, liquor was a simple part of the election process for ALL candidates in Virginia.  Voters would go to “tipping houses” where votes were cast and the smart politician would buy the drinks for those voting.  It was Washington who wrote the Governor asking that the practice be halted.  In a 1757 election for burgess, Washington refused to participate in the practice and was defeated by 40 votes.  In 1758, Washington didn’t fight it and won by a sizeable margin over his opponent.

No where did FOX explain Washington resisted it and that ALL politicians did this.  Nor did they mention this was for a minor state office and had nothing to do with his Presidency.

Is it any wonder that with this kind of communication by the only “conservative” mainstream media that we are in such a battle?  This is the kind of thing that Malkin, Levin and Limbaugh pulled on conservatives by their incomplete (or worse) commentary during the GOP primary.

I didn’t watch it but asked the National Training Director for the True the Vote how the second half hour went.  Again – it was incomplete and more of the same.  Missing the REAL stories of clear fraudulent voting in favor of trying to not attack the Democratic machine too hard.  No mention of the Soros Secretary of State program to put corrupt Democrats in power to steal elections.  No talk of the studies on that prove Voter ID actually HELPS the disadvantaged in elections (as well as Democrats). 

In fact, in Al Franken case were over 1000 felons illegally voted, FOX interviewed only 10 (9 of who voted for Franken) and concluded they couldn’t truly ascertain if this was a planned Democrat initiative or not.  Of course, all they had to do was interview just a fraction more and they would have had a statistically significant sample to ABSOUTELY make that claim.

It seems it will be up to a small remnant of us to hold fast to the ideals upon which this country was founded and fight for truth.

God knows FOX has given up that fight.

We can’t let the mainstream media keep obscuring fact. 

We can’t let the CONSERVATIVE media (i.e., George Will, Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh) continue to omit, distort or misreport FACT based on their personal bias.

We can’t allow the GOP establishment to erase ALL of the progress made in the 2010 elections by diluting the message and leadership by a guy who was the most anti-conservative governor in Massachusetts history ONLY 7 years ago.

The fight starts now, and the GOP establishment domination stops here.


It’s clear that Santorum stole the election in Alabama from Gingrich and likely did in Tennessee as well.  Romney forces seemed to have done this in Maine, Puerto Rico and other places and I will eventually do a full post.  Meanwhile, here are two examples of Romney chicanery.

http://rightonweekly.com/a-strong-appearance-of-impropriety-by-reince-priebus-and-lenny-curry/

http://rightonweekly.com/crowning-romney-backfires-on-fox-news-and-rnc-as-delegates-voters-say-no/

As always – please join with True The Vote to become fight fraud at the polls.

Friday, April 13, 2012

Santorum Skedaddles and Conservatives Sell the Cause into Communist Captivity

Conservatives-Sell-Out

DC Morning hasn’t been the same since the amazing Jim Treacher decided sleep was more important than providing us daily intelligent snark and insight.  His unworthy replacement, Jamie Weinstein, acts like a condescending Washington liberal in her coverage of people continuing to flock to Gingrich with Santorum out:

1.) What does an adult who believes in the tooth fairy sound like? -- They sound like a Newt Gingrich supporter who still thinks the former House Speaker can win the Republican nomination. TheDC's Alexis Levinson talks with Gingrich's latest endorser:
"The Daily Caller caught up with the latest politician to endorse Gingrich, Delaware State Senator Dave Lawson, whose endorsement was announced on Wednesday after Rick Santorum dropped out and the vast majority of pundits declared the race at the end. 'The race isn’t over until the votes are counted, and so I don’t believe the race is over,' Lawson told TheDC. 'I believe that Speaker Gingrich certainly has a very good crack at this nomination; I believe he certainly has the right attributes to work toward putting this country back on its feet.'"
How do they define "very good" in Delaware? It couldn't possibly be defined the same way it is in every other state.

Reportedly, Weinstein still believes that the Dallas Mavericks should have given up the Western Conference playoffs last year because no one could possibly stop the awesomeness that is the Miami in Heat also known as the Three Am Ego’s.

But ‘Communist’ PolitiJim?”

ModerateGOPLooserClub Romney is a socialist corporatist.  Human Events incorrectly labeled him a “Top 10 RINO” in 2005 LESS THAN 7 YEARS AGO. He’s much worse than a RINO having promised the gay, abortion and extreme environmentalists at one time he would be a stealth GOP candidate for their causes.  And by once again, blurring the choices between conservative and liberal values, the GOP is prepared to steal victory from the jaws of defeat.  Lynn Varvick from UCLA shows clear proof that in close elections, the “bigger” and bolder separation of ideas wins.

My quick comment on Daily Caller followed by thoughts on “fake” conservatives now giving up the race to Romney:

Great unbiased reporting Daily Caller!  I suppose you still think the long form birth certificate is real too.

What has happened to "conservative" media?  Epic fail for (electronic) rags like DC that disintegrate into establishment stereotypes.

In truth - with most Santorum delegates freed, the race is technically still VERY CLOSE in delegate count.

Forgive us if we don't just fall in line and bow to the GOP RINO pick who is only ahead because he outspends his opponents in false, negative ads - something he can't replicate in a general election.

Heritage Foundation founder Paul Weyrich was ready to BOLT the GOP if McCain took Romney as VPForgive us if we take a shot at putting someone in office who has demonstrated real government reform instead of expansion into areas of socialized medicine and gay marriage.

Or maybe you ignorant enough to believe Obama really was going to "cut taxes for the middle class" just because he said so?  Politicians always do what they say, right?

Katrina Pierson had a great comment on her radio show yesterday which was something to the effect of:

Let’s see if all those “principled”  conservatives show the integrity of still fighting against the GOP establishment that they said was so important when they were supporting Santorum, Perry or Cain

Consider this about how conservatives are acting since Santorum skedaddled:

  • National Right To Life endorses the man who not only initiated state paid abortions in RomneyCare, but got Planned Parenthood NAMED as a component of government oversight.
  • Pro-life Susan B. Anthony moved from Santorum to Romney.
  • The reliable Washington Examiner no longer has either Newt Gingrich or Ron Paul daily updates now focusing only on Romney/Obama.
  • Malkin, (David) Limbaugh and other “staunch” conservatives who couldn’t abide by Romney are already closing ranks around Romney via the fake media orchestrated Ann Romney working scandal.

The Wall Street Insider (WSI) at the Ulsterman Report explained the blueprint months ago and I had a hard time digesting it.  He said the “Pump and Dump” of these GOP candidates was COMPLETELY orchestrated by the Obama puppeteers.  Alan Keyes agrees in his column that the RINO GOP establishment was compliant in tolerating the Santorum run, knowing all along that Santorum merely would weaken the social conservative will power to anoint the Massachusetts moderate as their preselected choice.  I never bought into this because there is no way “unseen forces” could get a little old Tea Party lady in Alabama to “like” Santorum.  Polls aren’t perfect but you obscure actual VOTES, which Santorum suddenly assembled behind him.  But, with Foster Friess instantaneously jumping to Romney after predicting Santorum’s surge long before he hit the GOP charts in January – I’m much more willing to consider this.

I also had no explanation why supposedly sane conservatives like Malkin and Limbaugh would pick such an insincere supercilious Senator with such glaring socialistic union tendencies and conservative betrayals.  I’m not suggesting they were “bought,” but I also would never have believed the intelligent George Will would EVER write that the master of the Reagan Revolution was a “Marxist.”  It’s a fact that if you repeat a lie long enough, people believe it, and when Gingrich surged there was a relentless surge of even CONSERVATIVE articles spewing absolutely false stories of Gingrich’s accomplishments and conservative record.  Many like Malkin were simply too lazy or biased to do the actual research and just perpetuated the lies.

Maybe the Romney forces had been pumping this information to key “influencers” for some time as he did against Palin immediately following the McCain loss in 2008?  Just as Allen West and Paul Ryan showed an amazing lack of courage in standing up against $1 Trillion cuts to our military with the Bohener budget deal bill, our conservative media champions are more glass than granite?

He’s been orchestrating this method since 2004 combining it with payoffs to conservative groups.  As Harper’s exposed back then in their article on Mitt called, “How to Fabricate A Conservative”:

And the task of reformulating and repackaging the Romney brand—from the moderate Republican governor of the most liberal state in the Union to a red-meat social conservative and heir to Reagan—has been entrusted to an army of consultants far larger than that of any of his challengers. Campaign disclosure records are convoluted and poorly categorized, so it’s difficult to make a precise inventory. But based on filings with the Federal Election Commission, as of this summer, Romney’s campaign has employed more than a hundred different consultants, making combined payments to them of at least $11 million—roughly three times the amount spent by John McCain or Rudy Giuliani.

The article goes on to explain how they set up fake “Fred Thompson isn’t a conservative” groups, buy off key conservative grass roots campaigns and a “brand” marketing campaign you’d see for laundry detergent or motor oil.  The Boston Globe got a hold of a PowerPoint presentation that admitted he was known as a “phony” based on reality as much as perception:

Earlier this year, the Boston Globe obtained a copy of an internal campaign PowerPoint presentation that outlined Romney’s strengths and weaknesses as he embarked on his presidential bid. One page—entitled “Primal Code for Brand Romney”—explained that Romney should market himself as a foil to such Massachusetts liberals as Senators Edward Kennedy and John Kerry, and also run against such “enemies” as Hollywood, France, and “moral relativism.”…

As bad as Santorum’s wool was pulled over the eyes of social conservatives and Tea Party types, Romney’s campaign has been weaving a knit cap without eyeholes since he took office as Massachusetts Governor.  Get this: WHILE HE WAS STILL PROCLAIMING HIMSELF AS LIBERAL and IMPLEMENTING TAX PAYER ABORTION IN ROMNEYCARE, he was donating to Pro-Life and conservative groups setting up a “conservative” presidential campaign.

In seeking to woo conservatives, Romney has also used his personal PAC—the Commonwealth Political Action Committee—to contribute lavishly to several national pro-life groups, the Federalist Society, the National Review, and the Heritage Foundation, among others. In South Carolina, Romney set up a branch of the PAC all the way back in 2004. (He started branches in Iowa, New Hampshire, Michigan, and Arizona at the same time.) Since then, the state branch—with guidance from a number of consulting firms, including DC Navigators, a top Washington-based group—has run up expenditures of roughly $518,000.

No matter.  The primary is over right?  Who cares about massive Mitt voter manipulation or lies on behalf of Romney by the GOP?  That’s just politics right?  If it was good enough for Obama, it’s good enough for us?

No.  It’s called corruption.  And if you are a patriot, try looking your children in the eye when you explain why you bought “mere words” that purchased a more entrenched tyrannical socialist government that will be even harder to turn back in four years.  That is assuming we even HAVE elections in four years.

There were 3,000 that stayed with Washington in the winter of 1776 when 30,000 had left and abandoned their “dream” of freedom for the comforts of home and family.  Daily Caller, Right to Life, and the rest of conservative media who have decided to ignore the REAL battle against the GOP establishment are entitled to do as they will.  I won’t.

Here is reality:

  • Even if ObamaCare is overturned in court, the number of new departments, bureaucracies, unelectable tyranny of the courts and Federal Reserve are still in place.
  • In November, the voting public will not see ANY difference between Barack and Bain-boy on Wall Street bailouts, ObamaRomneyCare, or bringing back jobs since Romney’s record is as rickety as Barack’s.  Worse, they already think that Obama “cares” more and $1 Billion of Romney’s Bain banditry and “I don’t care about the very poor” blusters won’t better it.
  • Barack Obama has been planning to steal this election now controlling 6% of the entire voting population through George Soros controlled companies run by a known socialist who lived in Illinois when Obama was Senator and who was an Obama donor.  And he controls the lawless Department of Justice that will continue to protect him.
  • 400,000 union workers, Van Jones and thugs and countless Soros orchestrated forces have been paid off to create violence in the new wave of militant Occupy Wall Street to create chaos and bury the economic news all summer.

An insidious plot to overthrow America was started in 2008 and not only Republicans, but supposed “conservatives” still think this is just another election with the normal rules of war.  We are stuck with a Dorchester Dorothy that doesn’t understand DeMint from Dole.  And we aren’t in Kansas OR Oz anymore.

Romney has never shown an ability to war against media, against his own party’s liberal excesses (he was good at yelling against conservative Reagan policies once), or to fight for what is right when it isn’t politically expedient.  Why in the world would we choose HIM to lead us into the battle for the election much less the battle for the heart and soul of America’s Constitutional future?

This is a time for a general of media strategy and savagery.  And that is NOT Willard Mitt RINOy.

I suppose on one hand we get what we deserve.  It’s just that those who see the impending signs of tyranny think the blood of our founders deserves better.  As do our children.

I’m still fighting for, and with, the only PATRIOT left in the race, who is equipped for guerrilla media and political warfare.  God bless every REAL patriot like Delaware State Senator Dave Lawson, who is turning down the chance at Romney’s 30 pieces of silver. 

I will not participate in the sellout of America.


UPDATE: This from our good friends at GulagBound quoting former Romney top campaign strategist, Mike Murphy on more of Romney’s “planned” professions to fit whatever political position he needed:

“That same article quoted his top strategist at the time, Mike Murphy, as saying Mr. Romney had been ‘a pro-life Mormon faking it as a pro-choice friendly.’” That he’s always been pro-life. He just faked being pro-choice once he was in Massachusetts. “‘Faking it?’ … Mike was suggesting that Romney intentionally misled the people of Massachusetts.”

Please read the entire article.

Monday, December 19, 2011

Chicago Sports Media Embarrass Us Again

Hanie

And it doesn’t stop.  This from Dan Pompei (a normally insightful and thoughtful writer) on why Caleb Hanie is the root of all evil from the Trib on :

The season of this quarterback-cursed franchise ended on Wednesday, Nov. 23, at 3 p.m..  That's when Kyle Orton was awarded to the Chiefs, not the Bears, by virtue of their standing in front of the Bears in the waiver claiming order.  One month later, the Chiefs have a quarterback who can beat the Packers.

WHAT!  Orton got replaced by a QB even his own coach and management didn’t like because Orton was 1-4!  And a rookie with even WORSE throwing than Kyle Orton went 7-2 with EXACTLY the same team around him.

Did you LOOK at Cam Newton’s record who also got his first start this year like Hanie?  He was 2-8.  Where was this angst against Cutler when he went 1-4 early this year?  Dan is now prescient predicting although just 3 weeks ago he wrote this:

As off the mark as Hanie was, however — and make no mistake, he was very off the mark — he still could have beaten the Chiefs. In fact, he had the Bears in position to win. It’s Not Hanie’s Fault.

David Haugh and Brad Briggs lamented the terrible loss of Olin Kreutz and lambasted the Bears although Kruetz couldn’t even cut it with the Saints.  And I don’t mean just play.  The man just flipped his new team off and quit.  This from someone lionized as a Bears locker room leader.

And congratulations Chicago media!  Your complete lack of objectivity has now gone national!

With Hanie’s first loss, Tom Waddle and Marc Silvey talked like Hanie had never nearly won the NFC Championship game last year when Cutler couldn’t move the team even 10 yards a series.  Somehow a rookie quarterback was supposed to perform like Cutler had the past 5 games when Cutler was a disaster the first 5 and most of last year.

I can’t tell if it is unrealistic expectations or the poison of Chicago politics now entering sports media.

Even the Fox TV announcers Chris Myers, Tim Ryan were befuddled by the Chicago media.  After Caleb rallied the Bears to a 14-7 half time lead with an excellent throw to Bell for a touchdown, they said (paraphrased from memory):

The local sports talk radio has been brutal on Caleb Hanie.  It doesn’t make any sense.  It’s almost personal.

And there you have it.

Simply, if the all knowing Chicago sports media thinks someone is worthy of being protected (like Orton, Kruetz or Cutler) they will give you good press.  If they don’t, you will become the scapegoat for all evils whether you like it or not.

Forget reasoned analysis and patience.  And like a typical Democrat Chicago politician, they simply IGNORE facts to push their own angle.  After weeks of castigating Bears management for not paying Forte, it finally came out that the Bears had offered Forte a MORE than reasonable extension in training camp that he turned down.  Forte is paying for it now, but MOST of the ESPN, Trib/Times reporters act like it never happened, never ONCE writing this kind of scathing piece against someone willing to jeopardize the backbone of the Bears franchise.

Two caveats to all this.  I will say at least the Chicago media CARES about their sports.  I live in Houston where any new development is treated like the grand opening of a new Piggly Wiggly.  Also, I must say I may have overestimated Hanie’s potential as well.  He is a good quarterback and needs real snaps to show us what he’s got.  Pompei was right in his FIRST piece weeks ago.  The inability to get a little time in the pocket isn’t Caleb’s fault.  The inability of the defense to stop 80 yard drives isn’t his either.  But he will need to show a bit more control of the ball and run more often.

Even if Urlacher publicly declares him a running back as he did Tebow.  And then there is that which the media refuses to take Urlacher to task on either.  Good thing I have a backup team this year Cutler or not.

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More